Here’s an interesting–but short–AFP story about Charles Taylor’s defense lawyers claiming that the prosecution is wasting money by bringing unnecessary witnesses to The Hague to testify. Taylor’s lawyers frequently say they do not deny that crimes were committed in Sierra Leone, but rather deny Taylor’s responsibility for these crimes. The defense argues that witnesses called to prove that a crime was a committed are unnecessary. The prosecution claims that in trial defense has questioned certain crimes, so these witnesses are necessary. This story is just a he-said-she-said article, and does not look at court transcripts to figure out if, in fact, the defense has questioned certain crimes.
My Favorite Books About Liberia
Tags
Armed Forces of Liberia
Blogs
books
Cambodia
Charles Taylor
Chucky Taylor
corruption
Cote d'Ivoire
Critique of reporting on Liberia
decentralization
diaspora
Ellen Johnson Sirleaf
Employment in Liberia
Equatorial Guinea
George Weah
Guinea
Harry Greaves
Hausa
Independent Human Rights Commission
International Criminal Court
Issa Sesay
justice
Kano
Laurent Gbagbo
Liberia
LURD
media
mercenaries
Naija music
natural resources
NGOs
Nigeria
NPFL
Polio
Radovan Karadzic
RUF
rule of law
secret societies
sexual violence
Special Court for Sierra Leone
Truth and Reconciliation Commission
ULIMO
UNMIL
Victor Bout
war crimes tribunal
Hi. I came across your blog because of reading other horrid posts by dudley doo-wrong (nee sharp)on another blog. Just wanted to say that I agreed with your original post and wish that certain people weren’t curtailing discussions with angry invective.